0272-1716 (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/MCG.2020.3025078, IEEE
to leverage participants’ embodied knowledge, and prompt
them to reveal insights that may not otherwise come to mind.
Our focus has been on people’s ability to engage with their
personalized objects and, through that engagement, recall
personal stories and reflect upon person-data relationships.
For future research, we anticipate exploring other sense
modalities for personalized, kinesthetic, tasty, smelly,
stimulating narrative physicalisations based on personally
meaningful data.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Barrass. Acoustic sonification of bloodpressure in the form of a
singing bowl. In Conference on Sonification of Health and
Environmental Data (SoniHED), 2014.
[2] E. P.S. Baumer, V. Khovanskaya, M. Matthews, L. Reynolds, V. S.
Sosik, G. Gay. Reviewing Reflection: On the Use of Reflection in
Interactive System Design. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on
Designing Interactive Systems, 2014, pp.93–102.
[3] A. Clark and D. Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. analysis58, 1
(1998), pp. 7–19.
[4] Shaun Gallagher and Dan Zahavi. The phenomenological mind.
Routledge. 2012.
[5] M. Heidegger, J. Macquarrie, E. Robinson. Being and time, 1962.
[6] T. Hogan and E. Hornecker. Towards a design space for multisensory
data representation, Interacting with Computers, 2017, pp. 147-167.
[7] S. Huron, P. Gourlet, U. Hinrichs, T. Hogan, Y. Jansen. Let’s Get
Physical: Promoting Data Physicalization in Workshop Formats, In
Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
(DIS ’17), New York, 2017, pp. 1409–1422.
[8] Y. Jansen, P. Dragicevic, P. Isenberg, J. Alexander, A. Karnik, J.
Kildal, S. Subramanian, K.Hornbæk. Opportunities and challenges for
data physicalization, In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2015, pp. 3227–
3236.
[9] D. Lupton. Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal
digital data, New Media &Society19, 2017, pp. 1599–1614.
[10] C. Neustaedter and P. Sengers. Autobiographical design in HCI
research: designing and learning through use-it-yourself, 2012, pp.
514–523.
[11] M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge,
(1945–2012).
[12] A. Rezaeian and J. Donovan. Design of a tangible data visualization.
In Proceedings of the 7
th
International Symposium on Visual
InformationCommunication and Interaction, 2014, pp.232–235.
[13] M. Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement, John Benjamins,
1999.
[14] E. Segel and J. Heer. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with
data.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics16,
2010, pp. 1139–1148.
[15] P.J. Stappers and E.BN Sanders.Generative tools for context mapping:
tuning the tools.InDesign and Emotion. Taylor & Francis London,
2003, pp.77–81.
[16] A. Thudt, U. Hinrichs, S. Huron, S. Carpendale. Self-Reflection and
Personal Physicalization Construction. In Proceedings of the 2018
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018, pp.
1–13.
[17] P. Verbeek. Materializing morality:Design ethics and technological
mediation, Science,Technology, & Human Values31, 2006, pp. 361–
380.
[18] Wilde, D. Designing Research Education for Global Challenges. She
Ji Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation. Vol. 6, Issue 2
Summer 2020, pp. 170-212
[19] C. L. Zhu, H. Agrawal, P. Maes. Data-objects: Re-designing everyday
objects astactile affective interfaces, InternationalConference on
Affective Computing and IntelligentInteraction, 2015, pp. 322–326.
[20] J. Zimmerman, J. Forlizzi.Research Through Design in HCI. In: Olson
J., Kellogg W. (eds) Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 2014,
Mary Karyda is a Doctoral Candidate in the Department
of Design at Aalto University, Helsinki. In her doctoral
research, Mary, explores meaningfulness - a part of
meaning making that relates to feelings - in relation to
physical representations of personal data in everyday life.
Her former training as an artist, in combination with her
background in design research inspires her to follow a
research through design approach. Her main research
interests revolve around data physicalization, personal
informatics, everyday objects and meaningfulness.
Danielle Wilde is Associate Professor of Embodied
Design at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU),
Kolding, where she leads SDU’s [body|bio] Soft Lab. She
specialises in participatory, speculative and critical research-
through-design, bringing focus to the social and ecological
impact of body-technology pairings and human-food
interactions. Core to her research, Wilde develops new
methods for thinking through moving, making and doing.
These methods enable diverse stakeholders to engage with
problems that cut cross disciplines and cultures, and develop
new practices, policies and technologies through a bottom-up
approach. Wilde publishes and exhibits widely across HCI,
Design Research, Citizen Science and Food Studies. 2020-
2021, she is Visiting Professor at Estonia Academy of Art
Doctoral School, helping them to build their research
capacity. For more, see: www.daniellewilde.com
Mette Gislev Kjærsgaard has worked with combinations
of design and anthropology in organizational as well as
academic contexts for the past twenty years. In 2011 she
received her Phd in Anthropology from the Department of
Culture and Society, University of Aarhus. She currently
holds a position as associate professor of design anthropology
at SDU design, University of Southern Denmark. Mette has
conducted research on i.a. community-based innovation,
digital play and design processes with a particular focus on
the applied and academic potentials of a design
anthropological approach. She is co-organizer of Research
Network for Design Anthropology and co-editor of Design
Anthropological Futures (Bloomsbury 2016).
Authorized licensed use limited to: Carleton University. Downloaded on November 01,2020 at 14:10:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.